![]() A clean reboot ensured near-optimal performance for each task. Copying the files in order the same way each time discounted any advantage one program would have had over another by way of caching. External A was a 2 TB internal drive in an enclosure, and external C was a 750 GB store-bought drive. All of the drives I ran this test on were 7200 RPM hard drives and had a cache of 8 MB. Why did I decide to do that? Well, there are quite a few factors to this test, including hard drive speeds. The 24 GB folder was a portion of my music collection, mostly. The 4.4GB file I used was my Wii disc backup of Donkey Kong Country Returns. The external drives were ejected and the system was rebooted between testing each program. This was done in order for each of the copying methods. And lastly, copied that folder from my internal drive to external C. Then, I copied a 24 GB folder (3300 files, with an average size of about 8 MB) from external A to my internal drive, B. Then, I copied that file to another external hard drive, C. First, I copied a file of 4.4 GB from one external hard drive, A, to my internal one, B. But with Path Finder, this capability is also natively available and I’m preferring the feature on Path Finder because it’s built natively to support OS X, while Ultracopier is a cross platform utility.In order to test fairly, I ran four distinct copy actions with each program and with the default Windows 7 copy function. For the Mac, there is Ultracopier which does essentially the same thing as Teracopy. For Windows, I’ve used file copier alternatives like Teracopy to replace Windows Explorer’s copy/move operations and have had smart queueing capabilities for a long time. But if you were to do exactly that using plain old Finder (or any other default file manager on any OS for that matter) everything runs at the same time. And there are many times when you would want to copy large files from multiple locations all at the same time, then walk away and get something else done while the files copies themselves over to the new location. It’s simple a known fact that trying to move/copy a file to a location on same physical disk is just slower than if you queued it up. I never understood why Apple never improved upon the file operations queueing mechanism. Best of all, every time you resize any of the columns on either side of the pane, the other pane follow suit as well, making it really easy to compare the attributes of the files on the two panes! But with Path Finder’s dual plane view, moving files between two folders can not be any easier. Using OS X Finder, you would have two Finder window open in order to perform your file management between the two locations efficiently. I’m sure you had times where you need to manage files between two different folders, moving them around or even comparing files between the two locations. So, if the attempt to list all the great features here seems futile, I would however list down those that I’ve found to be extremely useful which tipped me over to recommend it to basically any power Mac user I know. ![]() There simply is just too many features that are really awesome on Path Finder and as such, I highly recommend that you download the 30-days trial and check it out yourself (that’s what I did too!). Now, this isn’t a full review of Path Finder. I can also bet that there would be features there that you would wish Finder had. Perhaps with the exception of being able to cut and paste without needing to hit the alt key.īut if you find yourself using Finder on a daily basis and most of your time at work, then perhaps you should take a look at Path Finder. As long as all you need is simple file management capabilities, then it provides you with everything you need.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |